Elon Musk is lying: DOGE’s SSA fraud network turns out not to be as high as claimed

Department of Government Efficiency data contradicts earlier claims, prompting questions about anti-fraud protocols.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) made waves last month when it rolled out an anti-fraud system at the Social Security Administration (SSA). An internal report now reveals only two out of 110,000 phone calls showed a “high probability” of fraud, contrary to the 40 percent figure that MAGA circles have been citing. Even DOGE’s former leader, Elon Musk, and Vice President JD Vance promoted the inflated statistic, which was recently shown to be a mere 0.0018 percent in reality.

So, what happened to the grand claims of rampant fraud? According to a memo viewed by Federal Computer Week, DOGE’s measures not only failed to catch significant wrongdoing but also slowed SSA operations by around 25 percent. In fact, the new procedures may soon be scrapped altogether.

Why the Department of Government Efficiency’s anti-fraud procedures are raising serious efficiency concerns

DOGE’s initiative required a three-day hold on phone claims to verify potential fraud. While intended to protect Social Security beneficiaries from scam artists, this system appears to have caused more harm than good. The internal memo describes it as a “degradation of public service,” indicating that the move undermines DOGE’s stated aim of improving government processes.

Who should pay attention to these new revelations? Almost anyone who depends on telephone transactions with the SSA to update direct deposit information or make account changes. Although calls were flagged for further investigation, almost none were found to be fraudulent. This begs the question: is the solution worse than the problem? Below is a quick breakdown of the key figures mentioned in the latest report:

Stat or ClaimSourceVerified Accuracy
“High probability” calls: 2DOGE internal memoConfirmed
Total calls reviewed: 110,000DOGE internal memoConfirmed
Claimed fraud rate: 40%Fox News (March 27)Disputed
Real fraud rate: ~.0018%Federal Computer WeekConfirmed

As you can see, the data tells a vastly different story than what some media outlets have reported.

Facts every Social Security beneficiary should know about this surprising fraud data

  1. Actual Risk Is Low: The memo’s findings suggest minimal danger from phone-based scams, despite earlier claims of rampant fraud.
  2. Processing Delays Are Common: The three-day hold required by DOGE has led to slower application handling, frustrating many Social Security recipients.
  3. Policy Reversal Is Likely: Given the poor results, officials may remove or revise these requirements.

Still wondering if you need to worry about immediate changes to your benefits? For now, the SSA has scrapped its plan to ban phone-based account updates, especially after public backlash. Musk, notably silent of late, has not addressed the discrepancy between the reported fraud rate and the actual data.

In conclusion, the new procedures that promised to safeguard the system ended up hampering the SSA’s overall efficiency without uncovering any meaningful scams.

Leave a Comment